header-left
File #: INF 11-273    Version: 1 Name: Update on Matters Relating to John L. Doyne Hospital and the Cost Reimbursement from Medicare for Post Retirement Health Costs of the Hospital
Type: Informational Report Status: Archived
File created: 6/3/2011 In control: County Clerk's Office
On agenda: Final action: 6/16/2011
Title: From the County Controller, an update on Matters Relating to John L. Doyne Hospital and the cost reimbursement from Medicare for post retirement health costs of the hospital. (INFORMATIONAL UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE COMMITTEE)
Attachments: 1. Report, 2. Audio F&A 061/6/11
Title
From the County Controller, an update on Matters Relating to John L. Doyne Hospital and the cost reimbursement from Medicare for post retirement health costs of the hospital. (INFORMATIONAL UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE COMMITTEE)

Body
Milwaukee County had filed for Medicare cost reimbursement for the post-retirement health care expenses of former John L. Doyne Hospital employees. The claim was originally made in 1996, after the closing of Doyne Hospital. The County has made various attempts to recoup the cost reimbursement, including filings with the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. Staff is of the current position that any further attempts to receive cost reimbursement from Medicare will not be successful.

The County received a decision from the Department of Health and Human Services Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB) on April 13, 2011. The PRRB acts as the intermediary, on behalf of Medicare, on cases such as these. The U.S. District Court had sent the case back to the PRRB, to answer issues that the County had raised in previous filings with the PRRB. The PRRB decision has now answered all questions of reimbursement by the County and the U.S. District Court. The decision finds that under Medicare policy the County cannot make a claim for post-retirement health care expenses of former hospital employees as an administrative cost of the terminating provider.

All opportunities for appeal within DHHS, including the PRRB are now exhausted. The County could take the appeal back to the U.S. District Court. However, the decision by the US District Court, on the County's first appeal to that court found the PRRB arguments to be successful in all points, except for the inclusion of costs as a administrative cost of closing, which had not been answered by the PRRB. The unanswered question was referred back to the PRRB and was argued before them on April 1, 2010. The PRRB has now answered the US District Court open question. If appealed, the...

Click here for full text